
Agenta
: How to use it, features, and the business problems it solves
Add bookmark
What is Agenta?
An open-source (MIT) LLMOps platform that unifies prompt management, LLM evaluation, observability (tracing), and a prompt playground in a single tool. Supports Git-style versioning, branching, and environment switching for prompts, enabling developers and non-engineers to collaborate on LLM applications in production. Free for self-hosting; a cloud-hosted version is also available.
Business problems it solves
About "Agenta"
How to Use
-
Set up your environment (cloud or self-hosted)
Sign up for the cloud version, or self-host the open-source edition on your own servers with Docker Compose. Self-hosting is free.
-
Build prompts in the playground
Write prompts in the playground and compare results while switching between multiple models and parameters. Agenta supports more than 50 LLM models as well as custom providers.
-
Version your prompts
Manage your prompts in a Git-like way. You can branch and switch between environments (such as production and staging), and non-engineers can edit and operate prompts without touching code.
-
Run evaluations
Create test sets from production data or CSV files, and measure prompt quality by combining built-in evaluators (20+), custom evaluations, and human review.
-
Monitor with observability
Use OpenTelemetry-native tracing to visualize cost, latency, and execution details, and continuously improve your production LLM apps.
Features
-
Prompt playground
Test prompts against test cases while switching between multiple models and parameters. Supports 50+ LLM models and custom providers.
-
Prompt management and Git-like versioning
Version your prompts, with branching and switching between environments (production/staging). Non-engineers (SMEs) can collaborate with developers and edit and operate prompts without touching code.
-
LLM evaluation
Create test sets from production data or CSV files, and quantitatively evaluate quality using 20+ built-in evaluators, custom evaluations, and human feedback. You can run evaluations from the UI or programmatically.
-
Observability and tracing
OpenTelemetry-native, with monitoring of cost and performance and detailed tracing of complex workflows for debugging. Integrations for various models and frameworks are also provided.
-
Open source (MIT) and self-hosting
Open source under the MIT license, with self-hosting via Docker Compose. You can keep your data in your own environment.
Pricing
Pricing is current as of June 2026. Prices are in US dollars, and amounts in Japanese yen vary with exchange rates. The open-source edition is free when self-hosted, and the cloud version is as follows. Check the official pricing page for the latest details.
| Plan | Monthly Price | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted (OSS) | Free | MIT license, self-operated via Docker Compose, all features available on your own infrastructure |
| Hobby | $0 | 2 users, 5,000 traces/month, 20 evaluations/month, 30-day retention, community support |
| Pro | $49/month | 3 users (additional seats $20 each, up to 10), 10,000 traces/month, unlimited evaluations, 90-day retention, in-app support |
| Business | $399/month | Unlimited users, 1 million traces/month, SSO/SOC2/RBAC, 365-day retention, dedicated Slack |
| Enterprise | Contact us | Self-hosting onboarding support, custom SLA, audit logs, dedicated support, BYOC support |
※ Trace and evaluation limits may be billed on a usage basis for any overage (for example, $5 per 10,000 traces).
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Prompt management, evaluation, and observability are all handled in a single tool
- MIT-licensed OSS, so if you self-host you can keep your data in-house and run it for free
- Git-like version control and environment switching make it easier to manage prompts in production
- Non-engineers (SMEs) can edit prompts without touching code, making it well suited to team collaboration
Cons
- The interface and documentation are primarily in English
- Self-hosting requires knowledge of infrastructure operations such as Docker
- The cloud version has limits on the number of traces and so on, requiring plan design that matches your scale
Reviews & Reputation
- Developers praise it for bringing prompt management, evaluation, and tracing together in one place, making it easy to adopt as an operational foundation for LLM apps.
- Some note that because it can be self-hosted as OSS, it can be used even in environments where data cannot leave the organization, and that its Git-like prompt management fits real-world operations.
- On the other hand, some point out that the UI is in English and that self-hosting assumes infrastructure management.
FAQ
Q. Can I use Agenta for free?
Yes. If you self-host the MIT-licensed open-source edition, you can use it for free. The cloud version also has a free Hobby plan, and there are paid plans from Pro and up for full-scale operations.
Q. Is it open source? Can it be self-hosted?
Yes. It is MIT-licensed OSS, and you can self-host it on your own servers using Docker Compose.
Q. Which LLMs does it support?
It supports more than 50 models, including OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google Gemini, as well as custom providers.
Q. Does it support Japanese?
The interface and documentation are primarily in English. The prompts and data you handle can be in any language, but a Japanese-localized UI is not provided.
How Agenta differs from other LLMOps and AI app development tools
| Aspect | Agenta | Typical AI app development platform | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus | LLMOps for prompt management, evaluation, and observability | More geared toward app building and orchestration | Choose Agenta if you prioritize prompt operations and evaluation |
| Delivery | OSS (MIT) plus cloud | Varies by service | Convenient when you want to keep data in-house |
| Versioning | Git-like branching and environment switching | May be limited depending on the tool | Suited to strictly managing production prompts |
For a more detailed comparison, please also see the pages of related services.
